Search

Louise Richardson

A level Media Blog

Month

April 2017

Evaluation Question 4

How have we used media technologies during the the construction of our main product, ancillary tasks and evaluation stages?

Melissa and I created a podcast using screen recorder as well as Premiere Pro’s Speed features and transitions.

Here is our evaluation Question 4:

Evaluation Question 3


Audience Feedback


We decided to get a range of audiences as well as our target audience of teenagers to watch our horror trailer because we felt that it would be a more coherent response due to our target audience also being teenagers.

We asked them a variety of questions about our horror trailer and from this we were able to conclude a form of evaluation for our final media product/s.

Below Melissa and I have created a video of our audience giving feedback on our horror trailer:


QUESTION 3


We asked our audience a variety of questions and recorded their responses…


What went well?


One main audience feedback was their enjoyment of the variety of camera shots and angles that we had used in our trailer. Our audience really thought that the different camera shots, angels and movements that were included within our trailer significantly helped to showcase the horror genre well and often made them feel quite tense. For example, at the beginning of our trailer we make use of high and low angle shots with canted angles when tracking Callum’s character when he is following Rhianna. Many of the audience members said that it made them feel quite  ‘off edge’ when watching the video because of the way the camera shots were constantly changing.

Another particular audience feedback that was picked up on was the build up of tension using sound/music. The audience particularly thought that the diegetic sound such as the sound effects that overlapped the clips, emulated the tension in sections of the trailer. This in particular was seen at the end of the trailer where the sound pitch gradually increases and gets louder as the shots cross cut to one another, creating panic in the audience. The music from this point directly correlates to the action in the shot as it slows down and a heart beat is heard before suddenly a loud jump scare sound effects is used when the zombie jumps out at the screen.

The audience also noted that they liked the editing techniques. In particular, the found the various glitches and VHS overlays that were used over images and typography very effective. This in particular is seen at the start when the warning sign appears on the screen and a variety of glitches appear to break up the warning that is flashes at the audience. The audience felt that this effect made the trailer seem more real which created more tension in them due to the distortion they were viewing.

The audience feedback also showed that we effectively created a narrative/storyline that they would find enjoyable. They also noted that the narrative did not give too much of the plot away which left them on edge and wanting more, however it gave enough away for them to understand what was going in throughout the trailer. We notified the audience of the Narrative theory we had used: Disruption, Recognition and Attempt to repair, and from this information they informed us that we had successfully achieved these narrative points throughout our trailer. This was important for it to effectively fit to the conventions of modern horror trailers that we had found from our research.


What could we improve on?


There were a few things that the audience said that we could have improved to make our horror trailer more effective. One audience feedback that we had was in regards to lighting. Audience members informed us that our trailer may have had a more tense atmosphere if we had darkened more shots and filmed in more low-key lighting. For example, many of our shots in the stages of disruption were shot in the light and this meant that the shots may have not been as scary for the audience. This could have been improved by filming later on in the evening for the shots to be darker and more frightening for the viewers. Although we did add a grey overlay over all of our shots, in some of the clips this was not always effective and this could have been improved with this use of low-key lighting. To improve on this feedback we could have filmed more shots in low-key lighting or re-film the shots in low lighting, or we could have also added a darker tint. Despite this improvement, our audience felt that our general shots were effective and linked well to the horror genre.

Some audience members thought that us going against conventions of zombie horror could have helped our trailer be more abstract and would attract a wider demographic of people. We were informed that we could have achieved this by reducing gore, making the zombies more human like and making them more ‘paranormal like’.

One audience feedback stated that we could of used setting a bit more for effect. For example, they said that we should use more outdoor shots rather than the large proportion of indoor shots that we used. They felt that outdoor shots may have created a greater sense of ‘Exposure’ to the audience because the victim would have no where to hide. To combat this, we could have filmed additional shot outside and implemented them into the disruption section of the trailer to showcase the extreme fear that the characters were feeling. Despite this, audiences still proposed that our use of many indoor shots created an extreme sense of isolation, which was our original intention therefore we still achieved what we intended to as well as following the conventions of zombie horror.

Overall, receiving feedback from our audience allowed us to see that we had effectively aimed at our target audience in a suitable way.

Evaluation Question 2

In response to question 2 we have created a Prezi presentation and a Podcast to showcase our work. I used screen recorder to simultaneously edit this video and I also used Premiere Pro as my mine editing software for this video.

The video and links to our response is found below:


QUESTION 2



PREZI PRESENTATION


I have also included the link to the Prezi presentation that I created in response to this question in order for the images to be more visible and seen at their own leisure.

The Prezi presentation is below:

http://prezi.com/jzjbgxvcfyk1/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy

 

ALL VIDEOS IN RESPONSE TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS ARE LOCATED ON THE YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Evaluation Question 1

In response to question one we decided to create a directors commentry as an extension of our horror film. We have used a split screen technique to edit this video and have also imported and overlayed aditional clips and images to accompany our response.

The video for this response is below:


PANDEMIC – FINAL DRAFT


After months of planning and production, we have finally finished editing the final draft product for our horror trailer. We are proud of our final product!


PANDEMIC


Poster Final Draft

We have created the final draft of our horror poster. We decided to choose this poster out of the two original drafts that we poster because we felt that the close-up shot of the victim/villain was quite intimidating towards the audience and would make them feel more uncomfortable than the other poster that was a long shot of a silhouette in the school corridor. Although the poster that we did not pick established the setting with the corridor, we felt that this poster established the setting as well as the characters due to the presence of the girls uniform in the main image. This is a significant feature of our poster because it allows the audience to evaluate what the film will be about and what sort of characters will be in it. This acts a unique selling point for our entire promotional package because it effectively attracts in the target audience.


FINAL POSTER DRAFT


poster.png

PANDEMIC – Draft 3

We have created Draft 3 of our final main product. When creating our final product we will need to ensure that we include the two institutions that we have created at the beginning of the trailer which are a significant convention to film trailers.

Here is the embedded link to Draft 3 of PANDEMIC:

Magazine Final Draft

We have completed the final trailer for our film magazine front cover. We have taken into consideration all of the feedback we have gained from our audience and made use of red and black colours that link closely to out main product. We also edited the text to ensure it obtained the same industrial feel to it that the other texts in our other products also had. We wanted to do this to link the products within our promotional package close together.


FINAL DRAFT


magazine

We decided to choose this poster out of all of the other images that we had proposed such as the one of the zombie, because we felt that leaving the villain’s as more of an enigma to the audience,  would result in them being  more curious and scared when watching the trailer due to the fear of the unknown. This as a result would keep the audience on edge due to the eerie image and would therefore have more of an effect on them.

Draft 2

We have completed the second draft of our horror trailer. In this version we have added additional clips and have also changed around scenes and accompaniment to fit the trailer more suitably.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑